Skip to main content

Wonder Woman review (SPOILERS!)


So…Wonder Woman, 2017.

I am impressed.

Let’s get the obvious out of the way first, Gal Gadot is unspeakably gorgeous, yet plays Diana with such confidence and poise that indeed, as Sammy says, “you don’t know whether to be terrified or aroused.”  (And doesn’t that summarize the Israeli female soldier stereotype? Could a non-Israeli actress have pulled this off?) Yet at no time does Diana fall into the trap Heather MacDougal describes in her famous essay, “ I hate strong female characters” – in other words, a woman who is ass-kicking but that’s all she is, the one-dimensional figure epitomized by Scarlet Johannsen’s Black Widow. Instead we see Diana through a wide range of states of being – confident, confused, curious, despairing – we see how her naïve honesty is precious, but also fuels a certain hubris, and isn’t that the quintessential Greek mythic flaw? Her romance with Steve begins as curiosity, cracks when she realizes that, gasp, he has flaws (as first loves tend to do), and only manifests as love when she realizes he’s gone and it’s too late to explore it further.

The movie challenges the square-jawed male hero roles as well – nearly all the male characters suffer from some sort of trauma. Our male heroes are soldiers using “good guy violence” to beat “bad guy violence,” but they really just want to sing, or to be an actor. Characters who would normally be comic relief are still so, but are also the heroes (as opposed to just sidekicks for the heroes). They struggle with racism, and the conflicts inherent in fighting alongside, and for, the very people who deem them less than human (if anything I wish the movie had explored this a bit more). In all, it was very nice to see WW return to her antiwar roots.

What I loved the most was how the plot was a refreshingly more sophisticated departure from the classic action hero movie structure of, “hero has origin, hero wins some battles, hero suffers big defeat, hero makes kickass comeback.” From start to finish, Diana is an unstoppable force of nature. Even Ares doesn’t give her much of a challenge. Physically. No, Diana’s hero’s journey is mental, her conflict internal and coming-of-age-like: how can she retain the power of her idealism once her innocence is lost? Steve Trevor and his gaggle of friends are off having a more traditional male adventure, but that’s all in the background, happening while Diana’s center stage, having an adventure that is in a way a running meta-commentary on the action hero tropes.

Because of this, Ares is the perfect villain. At first I thought casting effete old “Lupin” as Ares was ridiculous, but then I came to realize that his physicality wasn’t the point. He is intensely threatening, NOT because he can throw lightning bolts – remember, Diana kicks his ass without too much trouble. No, he is dangerous because he positions himself as the god of truth. He offers to unmask humanity for what it is (as he literally does with “Doctor Poison”), revealing the ugliness and rot inside. In his explanation of the world – backed up, you have to admit, by very persuasive evidence – all struggle is pointless. Humans are irredeemable, so why waste time trying to redeem them? He threatens to dematerialize the whole concept of heroism.

It’s an incredibly postmodern challenge for Diana, and it’s a challenge the film forces us as viewers to face as well. Those of us who grew up as naive kids loving superheroes, until those dreams were chewed up by reality. There are times when the movie has her strike a cheesy “superhero” freeze frame pose, or make some statement like “love is what will save mankind.” If you, like many of us, are tempted to snicker and dismiss it as kitsch, then that positions you squarely on Ares’ side: the side that says everything is shit, humans are shit, that all endeavor is pointless and the world would be better off if it were empty of us.

Diana’s triumph is that she chooses to believe, chooses to hold on to heroism, not out of naiveté like she did at first --- but that, even after she’s seen the rot behind the mask, she still chooses to believe she can make a difference, that the struggle is worth it. Similarly, the movie offers *us* that choice  – we can dismiss it as cheeseball, or we can choose to let ourselves believe, even for just a few minutes in a dark movie theater, that goodness can triumph and love can conquer all. The choice is ours, and THAT is the freedom that Wonder Woman fights for. She fights to bring us, not the overthrow of some tyrant and then, yay, everything’s awesome (Steve even says, “it’s not like there’s this one bad guy you beat and then it’s all over"), but rather, the freedom to choose hope over cynical despair.
That’s the hero we need for today's world. That's a hero I’ll applaud any day.


Grade: A

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Review of Star Trek: Into Darkness (Keptin, the sensors are detecting spoilers ahead!)

My review of Star Trek: Into Darkness (re-posted from my old blog) It is a sign of my age that I saw this film on “standard” opening night, as opposed to late-nite sneak preview opening night two days earlier...and saw it in the company of ten teenagers students who are barely more than a third my age, and from whom my casual statement that I saw the original Wrath of Khan when it came out in theaters elicited gasps of awe...although whether pitying or reverent, I chose not to examine too closely. I will say that, as with JJ Abrams' handling of its predecessor film, St:ID was a fun ride that did not in any way defecate on the near-holy phenomenon that Trek has become to so many people of (brr, dare I say it?) “my generation.” Leaving aside the proliferation of modern colloquialisms (everyone curses with “shit,” uses expressions like “throwing me under the bus”...I realize we use plenty of far-outdated expressions in our language today, but it's just a shift fro...

Review of Star Trek: Beyond (spoilers!)

Review: STAR TREK: BEYOND (or, as I call it, Fear of a Black Galaxy) The nice thing about going into a movie with low expectations is that doing so dramatically increases your chances of having a good experience, and Star Trek: Beyond proved no exception. In many ways I think it is the strongest of the three JJ Abrams reboots, working out some of the kinks and improving on the weaknesses of the previous two, all while keeping the stuff that worked. I have only one large objection, which I can’t reveal without mentioning -- MASSIVE SPOILERS AHEAD * * * * * Ok, as always, let’s start with the good. Aside from a somewhat slow start, the pacing was excellent, and the action beautifully choreographed (the upside of the “Fast and Furious” guy being your director). There were some lovely tiny details here and there, like the many “swarms” we saw re-iterated on the planet (birds in the distance at one point, bees in a cave) as a reflection of the swam-attack of the...

Star Wars: The Last Jedi – Review

Dec 16, 2017 Star Wars: The Last Jedi – Review (I sense a great disturbance, as if a thousand spoilers were about to be revealed below…just so you know…) After “The Force Awakens” and “Rogue One” set such a high standard, I was expecting greatness from “The Last Jedi.” Fortunately, I was not disappointed. If anything, the film has taken its place as my second favorite of the series, next to “Empire Strikes Back,” to which “The Last Jedi” is spiritual successor. Much like in “Empire,” much of the film is spent with the heroes on the run from overwhelming odds, not only in physical combat but also in the struggle over who they are and who they want to be. It was a bold move to have most all the characters spend the movie in flight from an inevitably advancing foe, slowly getting worn down and killed off bit by bit. Much like “The Force Awakens,” it called on all manner of Star Wars tropes…and subverted them, in very clever (and often depressing) ways. Finn and Rose’s last...